Book Review - Should it Have Been Called Republic.Com 1.5? Reviewing Cass Sunstein's 'Republic.Com 2.0' (2007)

18 Pages Posted: 14 Mar 2008

See all articles by Peter Jenkins

Peter Jenkins

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: March 12, 2008


Sunstein's argument in the original 2001 and in this new 2007 version is that democracy requires a range of common experiences (social glue) and unanticipated exposure to diverse points of view, but that the Internet fails society on both counts. Sunstein believes that the Internet tends to create social fragmentation by encouraging individuals to sort themselves into deliberative enclaves of like-minded people and assisting them to filter out unwanted, opposing opinions. 2.0 is much less than it could have been had the author cited opposing points of view more frequently, not been so US-centric, and considered recent uses of the Internet to enhance democracy, such as voter mobilization and politician voting record sites. The book would also have benefited considerably from a discussion of virtual worlds, such as Second Life. Sunstein should be given credit, however, for withdrawing the misguided policy proposal presented in the original 2001 for legislation requiring cross-links between web sites of opposing viewpoints.

Keywords: 9/11, cross-linking, web 2.0, deliberative democracy, voter mobilization, political transparency, transaction costs, free speech, information aggregation, perfect filtering, virtual worlds.

JEL Classification: D23, K39

Suggested Citation

Jenkins, Peter, Book Review - Should it Have Been Called Republic.Com 1.5? Reviewing Cass Sunstein's 'Republic.Com 2.0' (2007) (March 12, 2008). CLPE Research Paper No. 10/2008, Available at SSRN: or

Peter Jenkins (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics