Who is a Winner in Volatile Markets? Evidence from Chinese Funds

Posted: 16 Mar 2008

See all articles by Yi Yao

Yi Yao

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Zhiyuan Liu

Nankai University - Department of Accounting

Rong Yang

Rochester Institute of Technology

Abstract

The proliferation of institutions has drawn an attention in the financial economists' interest on the effect of institutional trading on market volatility for a few decades. Existing research on institutional investors, however, has not considered separating a bull market from a bear market, an important macroeconomic factor, in studying the role of institutional trading in market volatility. In addition, few studies have focused on emerging markets in developing countries. Particularly, who can identify the change in macroeconomic fundamentals, make more rational decisions, and eventually dominate the Chinese emerging stock market, institutions or individuals? Addressing this gap, this study examines the impact of institutional trading on the Chinese emerging volatile markets, from bearish markets (2001-2003) to bullish markets (2004-2006), effectively integrating the institutional (de)stabilizing effect into a more completely developed perceptive. In particular, we investigate the relationship between the level of institutional ownership and a firm's abnormal returns on large market movement days. We find that institutions are able to make quicker and more rational adjustments in their trading strategies as compared to the delayed market reactions due to a change in macroeconomic trend and a supervising regulatory policy issued at the beginning of 2004. Institutions use different trading strategies from bearish markets (2001-2003) to bullish markets (2004-2006), on large market movement days, such as selling against a rising market in bearish markets while continually pushing the entire stock index up in bullish markets. Moreover, institutions successfully predict the tendency of future stock market although the Chinese stock market is more volatile than others. Meanwhile, we find that institutions buy (sell) less than individuals on large price swing days, consistent with the notion that institutions are more rational than individuals in emerging markets. Further, systematic risk in the Chinese stock market is twenty-four times than that in US, reflecting a significant difference between an emerging market and a developed market. Overall, these results indicate that institutions become a winner in the Chinese stock market.

Keywords: Institutions, Returns, Turnover, Volatility, Emerging Markets

JEL Classification: G18, G21

Suggested Citation

Yao, Yi and Liu, Zhiyuan and Yang, Rong, Who is a Winner in Volatile Markets? Evidence from Chinese Funds. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1105753 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105753

Yi Yao

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Zhiyuan Liu

Nankai University - Department of Accounting ( email )

94 Weijin Road, Nankai District
Tianjin, Tianjin 300071
China

Rong Yang (Contact Author)

Rochester Institute of Technology ( email )

Saunders College of Business
Rochester Institute of Technology
Rochester, NY 14623
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
258
PlumX Metrics