Investment and Value: A Neoclassical Benchmark
46 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2008 Last revised: 21 Nov 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Investment and Value: A Neoclassical Benchmark
Investment and Value: A Neoclassical Benchmark
Date Written: March 2008
Abstract
Which investment model best fits firm-level data? To answer this question we estimate alternative models using Compustat data. Surprisingly, the two best-performing specifications are based on Hayashi's (1982) model. This model's foremost implication, that Q is a sufficient statistic for determining a firm's investment decision, has been often rejected because cash-flow and lagged-investment effects are present in investment regressions. However, we find that these regression results are quite fragile and ineffectual for evaluating model performance. So, forget what investment regressions tell you. Models based on Hayashi (1982) provide a very good description of investment behavior at the firm level.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
By Steven M. Fazzari, Bruce C. Petersen, ...
-
Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and Q
By Timothy Erickson and Toni M. Whited
-
Inflation, Taxation, and Corporate Investment: A Q-Theory Approach
-
The Stock Market, Profit and Investment
By Olivier J. Blanchard, Changyong Rhee, ...
-
Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are Not Valid Measures of Financing Constraints
By Steven N. Kaplan and Luigi Zingales
-
The Present Value of Profits and Cyclical Movements in Investment