Footnotes (70)



Against Judgment

Katherine Y. Barnes

University of Arizona Rogers College of Law

March 18, 2008

Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 08-04

This piece reviews Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age by Bernard E. Harcourt. In this provocative and innovative book, Harcourt argues that prediction has serious flaws and, more importantly, warps society's view of justice by focusing solely on justice that is quantifiable. The book review first outlines Harcourt's three criticisms against prediction and discusses how these criticisms interrelate. These criticisms demonstrate that it is not prediction that Harcourt is against; rather, it is human judgment, and the danger inherent in flawed people making crucial decisions in the criminal justice system. The book review concludes, as does Against Prediction, with a discussion of using randomization in the criminal justice system, and provides an alternative to Harcourt's draconian decision to eliminate prediction.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: criminal justice, empirical methods, racial profiling, prediction

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 20, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Barnes, Katherine Y., Against Judgment (March 18, 2008). Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 08-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1108125

Contact Information

Katherine Y. Barnes (Contact Author)
University of Arizona Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 780
Downloads: 109
Download Rank: 199,468
Footnotes:  70