35 Pages Posted: 20 Mar 2008
"Piercing the corporate veil" (piercing) has a long, if controversial, history in the law of business. It allows creditors of such an entity to disregard the limited liability normally given its shareholders and hold them personally answerable for the debts of the enterprise. The remedy arose as a counterbalance to the asset shield normally afforded corporate investors, and it is closely tied to important issues involving the accountability and social responsibility of business.
In the last decade, this special protection - at first only given to corporate shareholders - has been extended to investors in two new business entities, the limited liability company (LLC) and the limited liability partnership (LLP). Consequently, concerns have been expressed about whether the piercing doctrine should be applied to those companies and, if so, how it should affect their liability shields.
JEL Classification: K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Morrissey, Daniel J., Piercing All the Veils: Applying an Established Doctrine to a New Business Order. Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1109180
By David Millon
By Peter Oh
By Rebecca Huss
By Thomas Cheng
By Y. Kryvoi