Proportionality and Remedies in WTO Disputes

24 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2008 Last revised: 5 Jun 2015

See all articles by Andrew D. Mitchell

Andrew D. Mitchell

University of Melbourne - Law School

Date Written: November 1, 2006

Abstract

This article considers the role of proportionality in determining the level and type of remedies available to World Trade Organization Members for violations of legal obligations or for certain other undesirable or unfair conduct. As an aid to interpretation, proportionality confirms the purpose of suspension of concessions as inducing compliance and may clarify the meaning of "nullification or impairment" and the appropriate response to actionable or prohibited subsidies. However, principles such as proportionality must yield to the relevant text of the WTO agreements, where that text is unambiguous, and WTO Tribunals must carefully investigate the meaning and scope of a principle before using it in the WTO. Contrary to certain past decisions, the principle of proportionality is not relevant to the imposition of safeguards in the WTO.

Suggested Citation

Mitchell, Andrew D., Proportionality and Remedies in WTO Disputes (November 1, 2006). European Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, Issue 5, pp. 985-1008, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1115068 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chl034

Andrew D. Mitchell (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne - Law School ( email )

University Square
185 Pelham Street, Carlton
Victoria, Victoria 3010
Australia
+61383441098 (Phone)
+61393472392 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/staff/Andrew%20Mitchell

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
28
Abstract Views
487
PlumX Metrics