The Second Adoption of the Free Exercise Clause: Religious Exemptions Under the Fourteenth Amendment

52 Pages Posted: 7 Apr 2008  

Kurt T. Lash

University of Illinois College of Law

Abstract

This Article explores the proposition that the Free Exercise Clause was adopted a second time through its incorporation into the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and that the scope of the new Free Exercise Clause was intended to include protections un-anticipated at the Founding. Contrary to Jeffersonian notions of separate spheres, the nation by the time of Reconstruction had experienced decades of clashes resulting from the overlapping concerns of religion and government. In particular, the suppression of slave religion called into question the government's power to interfere, even indirectly, with legitimate religious exercise. Accordingly, the Privileges or Immunities Clause incorporated a conception of religious liberty vastly different from that intended in 1791 and constitutes a constitutional modification of the original rights of conscience. Religious exemptions from generally applicable laws, considered unnecessary and improbable at the Founding, now became necessary and proper.

Suggested Citation

Lash, Kurt T., The Second Adoption of the Free Exercise Clause: Religious Exemptions Under the Fourteenth Amendment. Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1994; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2008-10. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1116283

Kurt T. Lash (Contact Author)

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
Rank
143,093
Abstract Views
845