Default Investment Options in Defined Contribution Plans: A Quantitative Comparison

12 Pages Posted: 14 Apr 2008 Last revised: 29 Sep 2009

See all articles by Gaobo Pang

Gaobo Pang

Mark J. Warshawsky

Towers Watson; Mercatus Center at George Mason University

Date Written: March 1, 2007

Abstract

With the passage of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 and the Department of Labor regulation regarding qualified default investment alternatives, automatic enrollment and default investments featuring more equities are likely to become more popular. This analysis compares the investment performance of a balanced fund and a lifecycle fund, using average asset allocations observed on the market. Simulations show that the balanced fund is more likely to outperform the lifecycle fund, but its more aggressive approach also leaves plan participants vulnerable to losses as retirement approaches. The lifecycle fund is better at safeguarding wealth in a downward market, while still doing a reasonable job of building wealth. The typical lifecycle fund, however, with a large cash position at retirement, forgoes hedging opportunities for the purchase of immediate life annuities. Neither fund is a sure win over the near-risk-free Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities.

Keywords: Balanced and Lifecycle Funds, Qualified Default Investment Alternatives (QDIAs), Defined Contribution Plans, Pension Protection Act

JEL Classification: G11, G18, G23, J32, D14

Suggested Citation

Pang, Gaobo and Warshawsky, Mark J., Default Investment Options in Defined Contribution Plans: A Quantitative Comparison (March 1, 2007). Pensions: an International Journal, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 221-226, October 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1119368

Mark J. Warshawsky

Towers Watson ( email )

Arlington, VA
United States

Mercatus Center at George Mason University

3434 Washington Blvd., 4th Floor
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

No contact information is available for Gaobo Pang

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
231
Abstract Views
1,545
rank
183,179
PlumX Metrics