Does Quality Win? Network Effects versus Quality in High-Tech Markets
Journal of Marketing Research, Forthcoming
56 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2008 Last revised: 8 Aug 2023
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
Researchers disagree about the critical drivers of success in and efficiency of high-tech markets. On the one hand, a few researchers assert that high-tech markets are efficient with best quality brands dominating. On the other hand, many authors suspect that network effects lead to perverse markets in which the dominant brands do not have the best quality. We develop scenarios about the relative importance of these effects and the efficiency of markets. Empirical analysis of historical data on 19 categories shows that while both quality and network effects affect market share flows, markets are generally efficient. In particular, market share leadership changes often, switches in share leadership closely follow switches in quality leadership, and the best quality brands, not the first to enter, dominate the market. Network effects enhance the positive effect of quality.
Keywords: Network Effects, Tipping, Path Dependence, Quality, High-Tech Products
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Which Ad Works, When, Where, and How Often? Modeling the Effects of Direct Television Advertising
By Gerard J. Tellis, Rajesh K. Chandy, ...
-
The Optimal Data Interval for Econometric Models of Advertising Carryover
-
By Gerard J. Tellis, Rajesh K. Chandy, ...
-
Channel Power in Multi-Channel Environments
By Sonja Gensler, M. G. Dekimpe, ...
-
By Philip Hans Franses and Bjorn Vroomen
-
Why and How Quality Wins over Network Effects and What it Means
By Gerard J. Tellis, Rakesh Niraj, ...
-
By Gary L. Lilien, John Roberts, ...
-
Dynamic Platform Competition with Malicious Users
By Alfredo Garcia and Joseph Shen