Do Funds-of-Funds Deserve Their Fees-on-Fees?

34 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2008 Last revised: 9 Aug 2010

See all articles by Andrew Ang

Andrew Ang

BlackRock, Inc

Matthew Rhodes-Kropf

Harvard Business School - Entrepreneurial Management Unit; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)

Rui Zhao

BlackRock, Inc.

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: April 2008

Abstract

Since the after-fee returns of funds-of-funds are, on average, lower than hedge fund returns, it is easy to conclude that funds-of-funds do not add value compared to hedge funds. However, funds-of-funds should not be evaluated relative to hedge fund returns in publicly reported databases. Instead, the correct fund-of-funds benchmark is the set of direct hedge fund investments an investor could achieve on her own without recourse to funds-of-funds. We use asset allocation concepts to estimate characteristics of the fund-of-funds benchmark distribution. Since the benchmark characteristics are reasonable, we conclude that funds-of-funds, on average, deserve their fees-on-fees.

Suggested Citation

Ang, Andrew and Rhodes-Kropf, Matthew and Zhao, Rui, Do Funds-of-Funds Deserve Their Fees-on-Fees? (April 2008). NBER Working Paper No. w13944. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1121735

Andrew Ang (Contact Author)

BlackRock, Inc ( email )

55 East 52nd Street
New York City, NY 10055
United States

Matthew Rhodes-Kropf

Harvard Business School - Entrepreneurial Management Unit ( email )

Soldiers Field Road
Rock Center 312
Boston, MA 02163
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Rui Zhao

BlackRock, Inc. ( email )

55 East 52nd Street
New York City, NY 10055
United States
2128105015 (Phone)
2128108764 (Fax)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
160
Abstract Views
1,478
rank
21,708
PlumX Metrics