Taking it in Turn: An Experimental Test of Theories of the Household
31 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2008
Date Written: April 1, 2008
Abstract
Using a sample of established couples, we conduct an experiment on household decision-making. Individual partners first make a series of dichotomous choices between household goods and vouchers for experiences and then the couple jointly face the same choices. A random lottery device is used to incentivize the decisions. We find clear evidence of turn-taking as a method of resolving disagreements. In other words, when one partner wins one disputed question, it raises the probability that the other partner wins the next dispute. Given the arbitrary order of the questions this suggests that standard decision-theoretic models of household behaviour are inadequate and that instead, much behaviour might be concerned with relationship maintenance rather than the allocation of goods.
Keywords: Household choice, Experiment, Family, Invariance, Turn-taking, Psychological games
JEL Classification: C92, D13, D80
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation
-
Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection
By Isaac Ehrlich and Gary S. Becker
-
The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death
-
An Experiment on Risky Choice Amongst Households
By Ian J. Bateman and Alistair Munro
-
Altruism and Envy in Contests: An Evolutionarily Stable Symbiosis
-
Private Provision of Public Goods: Incentives for Donations
By Karen Pittel and Dirk T. G. Rübbelke
-
A Theory of Health Investment Under Competing Mortality Risks
-
Some Reflections on the Transaction Cost Theory of Nonprofit Organisation
