Cost and Benefit of Apprenticeship Training - A Comparison of Germany and Switzerland
39 Pages Posted: 29 Apr 2008
There are 2 versions of this paper
Cost and Benefit of Apprenticeship Training - A Comparison of Germany and Switzerland
Cost and Benefit of Apprenticeship Training: A Comparison of Germany and Switzerland
Date Written: April 2008
Abstract
For the first time it has been possible to merge a German and a Swiss firm-level data set that include detailed information about costs and benefits of apprenticeship training. Previous analyses based only on aggregate data showed that the net costs of training apprentices are substantial in Germany, whereas apprenticeship training is on average profitable during the training period for firms in Switzerland, even though the two training systems are rather similar. This paper analyzes the reasons for these differences with matching methods. We simulate the impact of changes in certain parameters such as wages, apprenticeship system-related factors and allocation of tasks to apprentices on the cost-benefit ratio using the counterfactual values of the other country. The results show that most of the difference in the net costs of training between the two countries can be explained by a higher share of productive tasks allocated to apprentices in Switzerland and the differences in relative wages.
Keywords: apprenticeship training, cost and benefit analysis
JEL Classification: J24, J31, J44
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Private Sector Training and its Impact on the Earnings of Young Workers
-
The Impact of Training on Productivity and Wages: Evidence from British Panel Data
By Lorraine Dearden, Howard Reed, ...
-
Minimum Wages and Training Revisited
By David Neumark and William Wascher
-
Is the German Apprenticeship System a Panacea for the Us Labour Market?
By Dietmar Harhoff and Thomas J. Kane
-
Beyond the Incidence of Training: Evidence from a National Employers Survey
By Lisa M. Lynch and Sandra E. Black