The Effect of Trial-Judge Experience on Appellate Decisionmaking Behavior

34 Pages Posted: 30 Apr 2008  

Nick Linder

affiliation not provided to SSRN

John Niles

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: April 25, 2008

Abstract

Appellate judges do not join the bench with tabulae rasae. Their life experiences shape their behavior, but to what extent? This empirical study investigates whether the experience of serving as a trial judge affects federal intermediate appellate judges' likelihood of voting to affirm trial-court rulings. The study analyzes 3,222 appellate votes from criminal sentencing cases that came before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit between 2003 and 2007, and it controls for fifteen factors other than trial-judge experience that might influence appellate decisionmaking behavior. From these data, several conclusions emerge: Prior experience as a state trial judge causes an appellate judge to be more likely to vote to affirm. Prior experience as a federal trial judge, however, has no statistically significant effect. Prior experience from both state and federal trial benches also has no statistically significant effect. Finally, the effect of state trial-judge experience diminishes when lower courts have greater discretion.

Keywords: judges, judicial decisionmaking, sentencing, sentences, appeals, appellate behavior, Booker

Suggested Citation

Linder, Nick and Niles, John, The Effect of Trial-Judge Experience on Appellate Decisionmaking Behavior (April 25, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1126655 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1126655

Nick Linder

affiliation not provided to SSRN

John Niles (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
109
Rank
205,713
Abstract Views
1,010