Nanotechnology and the Attribution of Responsibility

Nanotechnology, Law and Business, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2008

14 Pages Posted: 1 May 2008 Last revised: 9 Jan 2014

Date Written: summer 2008

Abstract

To attribute responsibility, including criminal responsibility, one must use commonsense psychology. Commonsense psychology allows us to understand and predict behavior via attribution of mental states, and thus to asses the relationship between a person's desires and any harm they have caused. This article discusses how nanotechnological advances, particularly in neuroscience, may affect our commonsense attribution of mental states, and thus affect assessments of responsibility. Neuroscientific nanotechnology may have this effect by providing new information about the mental states relevant to responsibility, or by allowing us to alter, inhibit, or 'implant' the mental states relevant to responsibility. I conclude that these possibilities of neuroscientific nanotechnology pose no unique threat to criminal responsibility except with regard to implantation of desires (the least likely possibility).

Keywords: Commonsense Psychology, Folk Psychology, Nanotechnology, Responsibility

Suggested Citation

Sifferd, Katrina, Nanotechnology and the Attribution of Responsibility (summer 2008). Nanotechnology, Law and Business, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1127279

Katrina Sifferd (Contact Author)

Elmhurst College ( email )

190 Prospect Avenue
Elmhurst, IL 60126-3296
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
102
rank
246,012
Abstract Views
938
PlumX