Citations (2)


Footnotes (237)



Integrating Accommodation

Elizabeth F. Emens

Columbia Law School

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 156, No. 4, p. 839, 2008

Courts and agencies interpreting the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) generally assume that workplace accommodations benefit individual employees with disabilities and impose costs on employers and, at times, coworkers. This belief reflects a failure to recognize a key feature of ADA accommodations: their benefits to third parties. Numerous accommodations - from ramps to ergonomic furniture to telecommuting initiatives - can create benefits for coworkers, both disabled and nondisabled, as well as for the growing group of employees with impairments that are not limiting enough to constitute disabilities under the ADA. Much attention has been paid to how the integration of diverse groups of people helps to ameliorate discriminatory attitudes through contact. But integrating people with disabilities also means integrating accommodations. These accommodations affect and benefit third parties in the workplace and thus shape attitudes toward both disability and the ADA. An understanding of third-party benefits is crucial to designing and disclosing accommodations in ways that will best promote the aims of the statute and the prospects of disabled people.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 84

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: May 6, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Emens, Elizabeth F., Integrating Accommodation. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 156, No. 4, p. 839, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1128331

Contact Information

Elizabeth F. Emens (Contact Author)
Columbia Law School ( email )
435 West 116th Street
New York, NY 10025
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,255
Downloads: 216
Download Rank: 106,868
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  237