Conflicts of Interest and Analyst Behavior: Evidence from Recent Changes in Regulation
41 Pages Posted: 14 May 2008 Last revised: 22 Apr 2009
There are 2 versions of this paper
Conflicts of Interest and Analyst Behavior: Evidence from Recent Changes in Regulation
Conflicts of Interest and Analyst Behavior: Evidence from Recent Changes in Regulation
Date Written: April 20, 2009
Abstract
Recent efforts of regulators have helped neutralize analysts’ conflict of interest. Analysts tended to make overly optimistic earnings forecasts prior to Regulation FD and the Global Analyst Research Settlement. Regulation FD made analysts less dependent on insider information and, thereby, diminished analysts’ motives to inflate their forecasts. The impact of Regulation FD is more apparent for firms with less informational transparency. The Global Settlement had an even bigger impact on analyst behavior. After the Global Settlement, the mean forecast bias declined significantly, whereas the median forecast bias essentially disappeared. These results are not limited to 12 banks covered by the Global Settlement, but are similar for all analysts.
Keywords: Analyst forecasts, Bias, Optimism, Regulations, Conflicts of interest, Regulation FD, Global Settlement
JEL Classification: G24, G28, G29, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Consensus Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns
By Brad M. Barber, Reuven Lehavy, ...
-
Security Analysts' Career Concerns and Herding of Earnings Forecasts
By Jeffrey D. Kubik, Amit Solomon, ...
-
By Patricia Dechow, Amy P. Hutton, ...
-
Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value?
By Narasimhan Jegadeesh, Joonghyuk Kim, ...
-
An Empirical Analysis of Analysts' Target Prices: Short Term Informativeness and Long Term Dynamics
By Alon Brav and Reuven Lehavy
-
How Do Analysts Use Their Earnings Forecasts in Generating Stock Recommendations?