Work and Private Life: Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania

European Law Review Vol. 30, pp. 573-585, 2005

11 Pages Posted: 21 May 2008 Last revised: 29 Oct 2009

See all articles by Virginia Mantouvalou

Virginia Mantouvalou

University College London - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

The European Convention on Human Rights has traditionally been regarded as a civil and political rights instrument. Recently, a new method of interpretation, which came to be known also as the integrated approach to human rights, is reflected in decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. This approach is based on the idea that the enjoyment of civil and political rights is rendered meaningless if social rights are neglected and that social entitlements are as intrinsically valuable as the interests underlying civil and political rights. The present piece analyses a recent judgment of the Court, Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, which is likely to be regarded as a paradigm example of the integrated approach, and explores its implications for the interpretation of the ECHR. It argues that the Court has to address the social rights implications of the Convention under a coherent theory of adjudication according to principles that lie behind the ECHR.

Keywords: right to work, social rights, ECHR, integrated approach to interpretation

Suggested Citation

Mantouvalou, Virginia, Work and Private Life: Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania (2005). European Law Review Vol. 30, pp. 573-585, 2005. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1134246

Virginia Mantouvalou (Contact Author)

University College London - Faculty of Law ( email )

Gower St
London WC1E OEG, WC1E 6BT
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
386
Abstract Views
1,620
rank
76,403
PlumX Metrics