A Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Three Solvency Management Models

22 Pages Posted: 29 May 2008

See all articles by Enyi Patrick Enyi

Enyi Patrick Enyi

Babcock University - School of Management Sciences

Date Written: May 28, 2008


The introduction of the Altman's Z-score model in 1983 and much recently the Enyi's Relative Solvency Ratio model in 2005 has divergently provided financial analysts with alternative methods of analyzing corporate solvency which hitherto was exclusively done using the traditional historical record based ratio analysis, with particular reference to the current ratio. To test the relevance and effectiveness of the three models, real life performance data were extracted from the annual reports of 7 quoted companies, analyzed using the three models and the results compared to show the strengths and weaknesses of each. The result revealed that the current ratio and the Z-score models suffer from many limitations including imprecision while the Relative Solvency Ratio combines the capability of an effective indicator with the precision required of a true predictor.

Keywords: Solvency, Liquidity, Ratio Analysis, Bankruptcy, Performance, Relative Solvency, Working Capital, Current Ratio, Current Assets, Balance Sheet

JEL Classification: G33, G29, M21, M41

Suggested Citation

Enyi, Enyi Patrick, A Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Three Solvency Management Models (May 28, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1138357 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1138357

Enyi Patrick Enyi (Contact Author)

Babcock University - School of Management Sciences ( email )

Babcock University
Sagamu-Benin Expressway
Ilishan-Remo, Ogun 121103
8069619343 (Phone)
8069619343 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.babcockuni.edu.ng

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics