The Choice of Equity Selling Mechanisms: PIPES versus SEOS
48 Pages Posted: 3 Jun 2008 Last revised: 8 Nov 2009
Date Written: August 11, 2009
Abstract
We examine the firm's choice between an SEO and a PIPE, an innovation in follow-on equity selling mechanism seen in the late 1990s. Our primary finding indicates that the rapid rise of the PIPE market fills the capital needs of firms which may not have access to more traditional alternatives. This lack of access is driven mainly by information asymmetry and weak operating performance. We also show that firms are more likely to choose PIPEs when the general market and the firm's stock are performing poorly. Furthermore, we find that selected firms with access to the public market may prefer a PIPE due to specific cost considerations.
Keywords: Private investment in public equity (PIPE), seasoned equity offering (SEO)
JEL Classification: G10, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Financing Under Extreme Risk: Contract Terms and Returns to Private Investments in Public Equity
By Susan Chaplinsky and David Haushalter
-
Does Investor Identity Matter in Equity Issues? Evidence from Private Placements
By Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Paul A. Spindt, ...
-
By Na Dai
-
The Quality and Price of Investment Banks' Service: Evidence from the PIPE Market
-
By Kimberly C. Gleason, Ravi Jain, ...
-
By Karen H. Wruck and Yilin Wu
-
By Ioannis V. Floros and Kuldeep Shastri
-
Blank Check IPOs: A Home Run for Management
By Vijay M. Jog and Chengye Sun