Citations (1)


Footnotes (253)



Copyright Harm, Foreseeability, and Fair Use

Christina Bohannan

University of Iowa - College of Law

U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-27
Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 5, 2007

Copyright law needs a theory of harm that can give effect to its constitutional purpose. In order to Promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts, copyrights must strike a balance between owners and users. Historically, copyright law struck this balance by granting limited copyrights, protecting only against copying that was likely to cause the copyright owner to lose sales of the copyrighted work. When the defendant used the work in a less foreseeable way, perhaps changing its meaning or purpose, the fair use doctrine was invoked. If the use was not foreseeable, it could hardly harm a copyright owner's reasonably expected sales. The fair use doctrine's harm requirement encouraged innovation by limiting infringement to uses that would likely affect a copyright owner's decision to create or distribute the work.

Over time, however, the scope of copyright protection has increased dramatically. This expansion leads to circularity in determining when a use is fair, as the copyright owner can nearly always argue that the defendant could have paid a license fee for the challenged use. This Article argues that current approaches to fair use, including the market failure and balancing theories, do not strike the balance necessary to achieve copyright's purpose, and that to do so, fair use must make liability turn on proof of harm.

Further, the Article shows that courts have developed a harm-based approach to fair use. This approach avoids circularity by requiring proof or a meaningful likelihood of lost profits that would be likely to have a material effect on a reasonable copyright owner's ex ante decision to create or distribute the work. Accordingly, it rejects the theory of copyright dilution, under which some courts have found harm where the defendant's use of a copyrighted work impairs the image of a work without causing any provable lost profits. It also argues that courts should allow defendants to mitigate evidence of harm to plaintiffs' sales by showing that their use also increased sales.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: Intellectual Property, Copyright, Fair Use, Market Failure, Balancing

JEL Classification: K20, K40, O31, O34, O38

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 5, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Bohannan, Christina, Copyright Harm, Foreseeability, and Fair Use. U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-27; Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 5, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1140345

Contact Information

Christina Bohannan (Contact Author)
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,261
Downloads: 182
Download Rank: 130,950
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  253
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper