Thick Instrumentalism and Comparative Constitutionalism: The Case of Gay Rights

55 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2008 Last revised: 4 Jul 2021

See all articles by Robert Leckey

Robert Leckey

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 3, 2008

Abstract

The paper intervenes in the burgeoning field of comparative constitutionalism. Adopting comparative constitutional research on gay rights as a case study, it addresses the scholarship that comparative constitutionalists are producing, including the methodology and underlying assumptions about constitutions. It criticizes the mainstream comparative work on gay rights for its methodological thinness. Such research views constitutions as rule-based, privileging the judgments of constitutional courts over the practice of constitutionalism in other sites of governance. Foreign examples are pressed into service to bring about change in a designated place. From the vantage of an activist or advocate, the comparative constitutional work on gay rights that is prevalent now may prove misleading. Undue emphasis on courts as the site of constitutional change directs efforts to litigation away from other forms of activism. The literature also exaggerates the transferability of constitutional precedents by abstracting them from their discursive and cultural context. Moreover, the consistent selection of a handful of "success" stories from pioneering jurisdictions distracts from the potential lessons waiting in the "failures," where reform efforts have foundered. From a scholar's perspective, the work is also unsatisfactory. Comparative constitutionalists, by accepting the current framing of debates, are failing to imagine transformations beyond same-sex marriage litigation and, consequently, falling short of their distinctive power as scholars. The paper argues for thick instrumentalism as a mode of comparative constitutional scholarship. Thick instrumentalism combines commitment to a justice project for gay rights with a richer, more discursive and culturally sensitive understanding of the multiple sites in which constitutional rights are respected - and infringed.

Keywords: comparative constitutionalism, gay rights, equality, comparative methodology, instrumental scholarship, gay marriage, same-sex marriage, legal scholarship

JEL Classification: K00, K30, K39

Suggested Citation

Leckey, Robert, Thick Instrumentalism and Comparative Constitutionalism: The Case of Gay Rights (June 3, 2008). Columbia Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 425-478, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1140387

Robert Leckey (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Canada
514-398-4148 (Phone)
514-398-4659 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
284
Abstract Views
1,516
rank
140,355
PlumX Metrics