Self-Fulfilling and Self-Enforcing Debt Crises
47 Pages Posted: 11 Jun 2008
Date Written: February 2008
Abstract
We distinguish two attitudes towards debt. The attitude of prudent borrowers, which attempt to stabilize their debts to low levels, even in the event of a bad shock, and what we call, after Krugman, "Panglossian" borrowers, which only focus on the best of their growth prospects, and rationally anticipate to default on their debt when hit by a bad shock. We show empirically that this distinction is consistent with the data. Past a threshold of risk which, we show, corresponds to a spread of about 450 basis points, countries fail to respond to bad shocks and let their risk drift accordingly. We also distinguish two types of debt crises. Those which are the effect of an exogenous shock, and those which are self-fulfillingly created by the financial markets themselves. We show that the large majority of crises are of the first kind, although the probability of self-fulfilling cases is not negligible.
Keywords: Self-fulfilling crises, Sovereign debt
JEL Classification: F34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
IMF Programs: Who is Chosen and What are the Effects?
By Robert J. Barro and Jong-wha Lee
-
Economic Determinants of Fund Financial Arrangements
By Malcolm Knight and Julio A. Santaella
-
Does IMF Financing Result in Moral Hazard?
By Timothy Lane and Steven Phillips
-
Does the IMF Cause Moral Hazard and Political Business Cycles? Evidence from Panel Data
By Axel Dreher and Roland Vaubel
-
The Macroeconomic Effects of Fund-Supported Adjustment Programs: An Empirical Assessment
-
Conditionality and Ownership in IMF Lending: A Political Economy Approach
By Allan Drazen
-
Debt Relief for Low-Income Countries and the Hipc Initiative
By Anthony Boote and Kamau Thugge