Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs in Federal Court: From Bad to Worse?
Harvard Law & Policy Review, Vol. II, 2008
34 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2008 Last revised: 5 Aug 2008
There are 2 versions of this paper
Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs in Federal Court: From Bad to Worse?
Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs in Federal Court: From Bad to Worse?
Date Written: June 7, 2008
Abstract
This Article utilizes the Administrative Office's data to convey the realities of federal employment discrimination litigation. Litigants in these "jobs" cases appeal more often than other litigants, with the defendants doing far better on those appeals than the plaintiffs. These troublesome facts help explain why today fewer plaintiffs are undertaking the frustrating route into federal district court, where plaintiffs must pursue their claims relatively often all the way through trial and where at both pretrial and trial these plaintiffs lose unusually often.
Keywords: empirical, employment discrimination, civil procedure
JEL Classification: K41, K31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
How Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs Fare in Federal Court
-
Plaintiphobia in State Courts? An Empirical Study of State Court Trials on Appeal
-
Plaintiphobia in State Courts Redux? An Empirical Study of State Court Trials on Appeal
-
Plaintiphobia in the Appellate Courts: Civil Rights Really Do Differ from Negotiable Instruments?
-
The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: the Paradox of Losing by Winning