Are Mutual Fund Expenses Too High? A Commentary

5 Pages Posted: 12 Jun 2008 Last revised: 3 Feb 2017

See all articles by John A. Haslem

John A. Haslem

University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business; University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 10, 2008

Abstract

The mutual funds industry does not compete on price. Mutual fund managers are the primary beneficiaries of fund economies of scale. Mutual fund managers charge too much for management fees. Multiple share class funds have higher management fees and total expenses than single class funds. "Mutual" mutual funds management at cost is much more cost efficient than the industry's external governance structure. Distribution from mutual fund supermarkets is not "free," but is paid from fund assets. Fund managers differ significantly in the amount of expenses they charge to fund assets. Mutual funds with different major characteristics, such as investment style, differ in their expenses. Regardless of trend, mutual fund expenses are too high.

Keywords: mutual funds, price competition, economies of scale, management fees, share class funds, 'mutual' mutual fund management, supermarket distribution, fund expenses, fund characteristics

JEL Classification: G2, G23, G28

Suggested Citation

Haslem, John A. and Haslem, John A., Are Mutual Fund Expenses Too High? A Commentary (June 10, 2008). Journal of Investing, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 8-12, Summer 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1143522

John A. Haslem (Contact Author)

University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business ( email )

5901 MacArthur Blvd NW 124
Washington, DC DC 20016
United States
202-236 3172 (Phone)

University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business ( email )

College Park, MD 20742
United States
202-387 2025 (Phone)