16 Pages Posted: 13 Jun 2008
This paper will examine the Sony Playstation litigation in Australia where Sony claimed the device it used in its Playstation consoles was a technological protection measure ('TPM'). The outcome of the High Court of Australia decision is somewhat different from similar litigation run by Sony in other countries. Section 3 of this paper will examine the economics of TPMs and in particular, the device which Sony claimed in its Australian litigation was a TPM. It will reveal that copyright owners such as Sony already possess strong market incentives to implement TPMs and that the level of competition is inversely related to the incentive to protect works through TPMs. Section 4 of the paper will introduce the competition law landscape in Australia and it will analyse, within the context of Australia's competition laws, the device used by Sony which it claimed was a TPM. It will demonstrate that the use of the device by Sony is arguably conduct in breach of s46 of the Trade Practices Act 1974. Section 5 will examine the role of the law in Australia in terms of incentivising the use of TPMs.
Keywords: Stevens, Sony, Copyright, Competition Law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lim, Yee, DRMS, Economics, Copyright and Competition Law: The Australian Experience - The Economic Implications of Stevens v Sony. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 67-82, 2006. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1144324
By R. Reese
By Dan Burk