An Alternative to the Constitutional Privilege Against Self-Incrimination

48 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2008  

Vincent Martin Bonventre

Albany Law School

Abstract

This article proposes that the 5th Amendment self-incrimination privilege, as it is presently understood, be overruled or repealed, and it proposes a substitute. After exploring the genesis of the privilege and its historical purposes, the article examines problems with the current privilege, as well as the values that it serves. Professor Bonventre contends that there is little independent justification for protecting the withholding of evidence by individuals reasonably suspected of criminality. The proffered reasons for such protection are typically circular arguments favoring the adversarial system and disfavoring incrimination by the suspect himself. On the other hand, Bonventre finds compelling reasons for a free society to guard against certain evils which are, at least partially, thwarted by the privilege: the inhumane extraction of confessions, government fishing expeditions, and unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. Professor Bonventre outlines a proposed alternative to the privilege which might avoid the present problems and more effectively promote the values it serves.

Keywords: 5th Amendment, self-incrimination, criminal law, confessions, interrogation, privacy, inhumane treatment

Suggested Citation

Bonventre, Vincent Martin, An Alternative to the Constitutional Privilege Against Self-Incrimination. Brooklyn Law Review ,Vol. 49, No. 1, 1982. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1145862

Vincent Martin Bonventre (Contact Author)

Albany Law School ( email )

80 New Scotland Avenue
Albany, NY 12208
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.albanylaw.edu/

Paper statistics

Downloads
57
Rank
303,032
Abstract Views
415