Should Legal Empiricists Go Bayesian?

Posted: 16 Jun 2008

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: Spring 2007

Abstract

Bayesian empirical approaches appear frequently in fields such as egineering, computer science, political science and medicine, but almost never in law. This article illustrates how such approaches might be very useful in empirical legal studies. In particular, Bayesian approaches enable a much more natural connection between the normative or positive issues that typically motivate such studies and the empirical results.

Suggested Citation

Strnad, James (Jeff) Frank, Should Legal Empiricists Go Bayesian? (Spring 2007). American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 195-303, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1145989 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahm007

James (Jeff) Frank Strnad (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-9674 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
704
PlumX Metrics