Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Parity Bowl IX: Barrier Breakers V. Common Sense Makers - The Serpentine Struggle for Gender Diversity in Collegiate Athletics

Cumberland Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 397, 1997

50 Pages Posted: 16 Jun 2008 Last revised: 15 Sep 2009

Darryl C. Wilson

Stetson University College of Law

Date Written: 1997

Abstract

This article reviews the most recent legal maneuvers impacting gender parity in collegiate athletics. Section I examines the origins of female participation in sports that allegedly support the current sexually discriminatory system. This article also analyzes the notion that the motivating factor in the development of Title IX was the need for overall systematic change, noting specifically that the origins of the Act had nothing to do with sports activities. Although the Act was an outgrowth of amendments to certain human rights legislation, the sports focus of Title IX is arguably an inappropriate analogy to the civil rights struggle in this country. Section II discusses the vast breadth of the most recent judicial and legislative responses to the disputes over the scope of Title IX. Section III argues that the current interpretations, when taken to their logical extremes, spell certain doom for big-time college athletics as Americans know it. By removing the facade of amateurism and professionalizing big-time college sports, Title IX can be affirmatively administered in a manner that is more equitable than its present application.

Keywords: Title IX, gender diversity, gender parity, collegiate athletics

JEL Classification: K10, K19

Suggested Citation

Wilson, Darryl C., Parity Bowl IX: Barrier Breakers V. Common Sense Makers - The Serpentine Struggle for Gender Diversity in Collegiate Athletics (1997). Cumberland Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 397, 1997. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1146654

Darryl C. Wilson (Contact Author)

Stetson University College of Law ( email )

1401 61st St. South
Gulfport, FL 33707
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Rank
319,151
Abstract Views
645