The Neglect of Monotone Comparative Static Methods
26 Pages Posted: 18 Jun 2008 Last revised: 3 Sep 2008
Date Written: May 31, 2008
Abstract
Monotone methods enable comparative static analysis without the restrictive assumptions of the implicit function theorem. Ease of use and flexibility in solving comparative static and game theory problems have made monotone methods popular in the economics literature and in graduate courses, but they are still absent from undergraduate mathematical economics courses and textbooks. We illustrate the generality of monotone comparative statics relative to the implicit function approach. For example, to sign the effect of a discrete policy shift on an optimal control or choice variable, one need only check that marginal returns increase with the policy parameter. We also apply monotone methods in game theory settings. As mathematical economics courses and majors gain popularity, incorporating monotone methods into curriculum and textbooks would provide a modern treatment of comparative static analysis.
Keywords: comparative statics, monotonicity, supermodularity, mathematical economics
JEL Classification: A22, C61, C70
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Mixed Equilibria in Games of Strategic Complements are Unstable
By Federico Echenique and Aaron S. Edlin
-
Supermodularity and Complementarity in Economics: An Elementary Survey
By Rabah Amir
-
The Effects of Merger Synergies on Consumers of Differentiated Products
By Gregory J. Werden, Luke M. Froeb, ...
-
The Effects of Merger Efficiencies on Consumers of Differentiated Products
By Gregory J. Werden, Luke M. Froeb, ...
-
Ordinal Versus Cardinal Complementarity: The Case of Cournot Oligopoly
By Rabah Amir
-
By Rabah Amir, Filomena Garcia, ...