Piqueteros: An Experimental Analysis of Direct vs. Indirect Reciprocity
35 Pages Posted: 20 Jun 2008
Date Written: June 18, 2008
Abstract
Research in behavioral economics has recognized the importance of reciprocity in individual behavior. The debate is dominated by a focus on direct reciprocity. Motivated in a real-life situation in Argentina - the piqueteros (pickets) conflict - I use a three-player three-stage game in order to investigate what type of reciprocity prevails in an environment that allows for both direct and indirect reciprocity at he same time. Results suggest that (negative) reciprocity from the directly affected individuals is more frequent than punishment from the third party. However, under our experimental design, when the third party has the choice between direct or indirect reciprocity, the latter prevails.
Keywords: Direct Reciprocity, Indirect Reciprocity, Social Conflict, Punishment
JEL Classification: C92
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods
By Martin Sefton, Robert Shupp, ...
-
The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods
By Martin Sefton, Robert Shupp, ...
-
Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Driving Forces of Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Punishing Free-Riders: How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods
-
Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Good Experiments
By Urs Fischbacher and Simon Gaechter
-
Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry and Efficiency
By Talbot Page, Louis Putterman, ...
-
The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation
By James Andreoni, William T. Harbaugh, ...
