A Due Measure of Fear in Criminal Judgment

Supreme Court Law Review, 2008

27 Pages Posted: 20 Jun 2008

See all articles by Benjamin L. Berger

Benjamin L. Berger

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School


What ethos is appropriate to the modern act of criminal judgment? In the long history of the criminal trial, passing judgment on the accused was, for the adjudicator, a fearful act filled with theologically-inspired anxiety. This article argues that, despite the contemporary attenuation of this specific form of anxiety, criminal judgment ought still to be infused with a due sense of the perils associated with passing legal and moral judgment upon another. This piece considers Justice Bertha Wilson's criminal law jurisprudence, arguing that, apart from her substantive contributions, her legacy in this field is to embody an adjudicative ethos and posture conditioned by a keen appreciation of the limits and dangers of criminal adjudication. A close examination of her decisions reveals a judge who is palpably aware of the complexities of the lives that appear before her, the violence of the criminal law, and the consequent imperative to proceed with caution and humility. In this, her jurisprudence serves as an ethical resource: we should want judges who, seized with a keen sense of both the limits and consequences of the criminal law, tremble at the moment of judgment.

Keywords: Criminal Law, Judicial Biography, Canada, Judgment

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Berger, Benjamin L., A Due Measure of Fear in Criminal Judgment. Supreme Court Law Review, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1147813

Benjamin L. Berger (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics