This Article Has No Footnotes[Fn1]: An Essay on RFRA[Fn2] and the Limits of Logic in the Law

31 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2008  

Steven D. Jamar

Howard University School of Law; IIPSJ

Abstract

This essay seeks to illuminate some of the limits of formal logic in a legal system through exploring some of the logic problems in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). Religious freedom is perhaps uniquely apt for examining the limits of logic in the law for two reasons. First, religious beliefs are based on faith and non logical or extra logical precepts (though internal logical consistency is often sought once the premises are adopted). Second, developing a coherent, consistent, logical jurisprudence of religious freedom has proven to be particularly intractable.

Keywords: RFRA, strict scrutiny, standard of review, freedom of religion, free exercise, constitutional law, law, rhetoric, logic, syllogism

Suggested Citation

Jamar, Steven D., This Article Has No Footnotes[Fn1]: An Essay on RFRA[Fn2] and the Limits of Logic in the Law. Stetson Law Review, Vol. 27, pp. 559-587, 1997. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1148830

Steven D. Jamar (Contact Author)

Howard University School of Law ( email )

2900 Van Ness Street NW
Washington, DC 20008
United States

HOME PAGE: http://sdjlaw.org/

IIPSJ ( email )

MD
United States

HOME PAGE: http://iipsj.org

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
63
rank
323,390
Abstract Views
929
PlumX