Targeting Tehran: Assessing the Lawfulness of Preemptive Strikes Against Nuclear Facilities

51 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2008 Last revised: 8 Aug 2008

See all articles by Kristen Eichensehr

Kristen Eichensehr

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: June 22, 2008

Abstract

In 1981, Israel launched a preemptive attack on the Iraqi Osiraq nuclear reactor. Now a similar strike is being considered against Iranian nuclear facilities. This Note assesses the lawfulness of preemptive strikes generally and a preemptive strike against Iran specifically, focusing on the new threat posed by terrorists' potential acquisition of nuclear material for a "dirty bomb." The Note begins by evaluating preemptive strikes on nuclear facilities against the criteria for self-defense - necessity, immediacy, and proportionality - and then turns to broader criteria for "lawfulness," such as environmental damage and harm to the legal rules governing the use of force. After developing criteria to evaluate the lawfulness of a preemptive strike, the Note concludes that a preemptive strike against Iran at this point would not satisfy the outlined criteria and thus would be unlawful.

Keywords: Preemption, Preemptive Strike, Nuclear Facility, Osiraq, Iran

Suggested Citation

Eichensehr, Kristen, Targeting Tehran: Assessing the Lawfulness of Preemptive Strikes Against Nuclear Facilities (June 22, 2008). UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1149623

Kristen Eichensehr (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
189
Abstract Views
890
rank
161,090
PlumX Metrics