Adjudication and the Law

13 Pages Posted: 24 Jun 2008 Last revised: 6 Nov 2018

Date Written: 2007

Abstract

It can be compatible with justice and the rule of law for a court to impose new legal liabilities retrospectively on a defendant. But judges do not need to distinguish between imposing a new liability, and giving effect to a liability that the defendant had at the time of the events in dispute. The distinction is to be drawn by asking which of the court's reasons for decision the institutions of the legal system had already committed the courts to act upon, before the time of decision. I explain these conclusions through an assessment of the last episode in the debate between H.L.A.Hart and Ronald Dworkin.

Suggested Citation

Endicott, Timothy A.O., Adjudication and the Law (2007). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 311-326, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1150623 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqm007

Timothy A.O. Endicott (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
15
Abstract Views
493
PlumX Metrics