Convictions, Conventions and the Operational Risk Maze - The Cases of Three Financial Services Institutions

International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 2008

Posted: 27 Jun 2008

Date Written: June 25, 2008

Abstract

Making sense of operational risk practices in the financial services sector is a challenge. There is a temptation to explain the wide variety of approaches as a characteristic of the early stage of development in which the genre resides.

Based on the evidence of three case studies, this paper explores the mechanisms that guide firms in their choice of operational risk methodologies. First, drawing on Power (2003a)'s notion of calculative cultures, we propose that senior risk officers develop 'personal philosophies' about the 'manageability' of risks. Second, we emphasise the role of institutionalised rules and conventions (Meyer and Rowan, 1977) in the selection and use of operational risk practices. The paper explicates a number of conventions that are being institutionalised in the operational risk area. The case studies draw attention to the conflicts between the demands of these multiple conventions, and how organisations struggle to resolve them.

Keywords: Risk management, operational risk, calculative cultures, financial services, chief risk officers, senior risk officers, new institutional theory

Suggested Citation

Mikes, Anette, Convictions, Conventions and the Operational Risk Maze - The Cases of Three Financial Services Institutions (June 25, 2008). International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1151409

Anette Mikes (Contact Author)

Harvard Business School ( email )

Soldiers Field
Boston, MA 02163
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
569
PlumX Metrics