Footnotes (211)



The Pornographic Secondary Effects Doctrine

John Fee

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

June 27, 2008

Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming

The secondary effects doctrine has made a muddle of First Amendment law. The doctrine formally holds that a speech regulation will be treated as content-neutral if its purpose is to control the secondary effects of speech, even if it facially discriminates according to speech content. It pretends to be a general First Amendment doctrine, but in practice it is all about regulating pornographic expression. This article aims to re-evaluate the secondary effects doctrine in a way that is more transparent. Appreciating the functional basis of the secondary effects doctrine is useful for understanding the doctrine's limitations, as well as for analyzing new types of regulation that may arguably fall within its scope. It also provides important lessons for general First Amendment theory, including how cost-benefit analysis affects the constitutional rules regarding content discrimination, and how the purpose of a regulation affects the level of scrutiny that courts apply.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, Secondary Effects, Pornography

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: June 28, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Fee, John, The Pornographic Secondary Effects Doctrine (June 27, 2008). Alabama Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1152424

Contact Information

John Fee (Contact Author)
Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )
430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,030
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 206,214
Footnotes:  211