45 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2008
Date Written: June 2008
We develop and implement a method to improve estimates of worker flows and job openings based on the Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS). Our method involves reweighting the cross-sectional density of employment growth rates in JOLTS to match the corresponding density in the comprehensive Business Employment Dynamics (BED) data. To motivate our work, we compare JOLTS to other data sources and document large discrepancies with respect to aggregate employment growth, the magnitude of worker flows, and the cross-sectional density of establishment growth rates. We also discuss issues related to JOLTS sample design and nonresponse corrections. Our adjusted statistics for hires and separations exceed the published statistics by about one-third. The adjusted layoff rate is more than 60 percent greater than the published layoff rate. Time-series properties are also affected. For example, hires exhibit more volatility than separations in the published statistics, but the reverse holds in the adjusted statistics. The impact of our adjustment methodology on estimated job openings is more modest, raising the vacancy rate by about 8 percent.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Davis, Steven J. and Faberman, R. Jason and Haltiwanger, John and Rucker, Ian, Adjusted Estimates of Worker Flows and Job Openings in Jolts (June 2008). NBER Working Paper No. w14137. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1152678