Statistical Significance Tests are Unnecessary Even When Properly Done and Properly Interpreted: Reply to Commentaries
3 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2008
There are 2 versions of this paper
Statistical Significance Tests are Unnecessary Even When Properly Done and Properly Interpreted: Reply to Commentaries
Number of pages: 3
Posted: 01 Jul 2008
You are currently viewing this paper
Downloads
119
Statistical Significance Tests are Unnecessary Even when Properly Done and Properly Interpreted: Reply to Commentaries
International Journal of Forecasting, Forthcoming
Posted: 25 May 2007
Date Written: June 29, 2008
Abstract
The three commentators on my paper agree that statistical tests are often improperly used by researchers and that even when properly used, readers misinterpret them. These points have been well established by empirical studies. However, two of the commentators do not agree with my major point that significance tests are unnecessary even when properly used and interpreted.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Armstrong, J. Scott, Statistical Significance Tests are Unnecessary Even When Properly Done and Properly Interpreted: Reply to Commentaries (June 29, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1153121 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1153121
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.