Defending Truth: Legal and Psychological Aspects of Holocaust Denial

Current Psychology, Vol. 26, Nos. 3-4, pp. 223-266, December 2007

University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-12

125 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2008 Last revised: 10 Nov 2008

Kenneth Lasson

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Abstract

From the still-burning embers of the Holocaust we have come once again to learn the terrible truth, that the power of Evil still lurks among the nations of the world, and cannot be underestimated. Nor can the effect of the spoken and written word, which in modern times must be taken in tandem with the violence of terrorism. Part I describes the background and nature of Holocaust denial, tracing the Nazis' adoption of a plan for the A "Final Solution of the Jewish Problem" through the post-War Nuremberg Trials to the present day. Part II examines the tension between free speech and historical revisionism, presenting various arguments in deference to principles of liberty and opposed to group defamation. Part III addresses the quest for truth in a free society, including psychological and geopolitical analyses of denial and anti-Semitism.

Keywords: Holocaust, World War II, free speech, historical revisionism, group defamation

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Lasson, Kenneth, Defending Truth: Legal and Psychological Aspects of Holocaust Denial. Current Psychology, Vol. 26, Nos. 3-4, pp. 223-266, December 2007; University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-12. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1154012

Kenneth Lasson (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States

HOME PAGE: http://law.ubalt.edu/template.cfm?page=590

Paper statistics

Downloads
192
Rank
128,480
Abstract Views
1,315