D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update To Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting

44 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2008

See all articles by Keith T. Poole

Keith T. Poole

University of Georgia - School of Public and International Affairs

Howard Rosenthal

New York University

Date Written: September 27, 1999

Abstract

This paper updates Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Congress is based largely on an analysis of the first 100 Congresses and is devoted to showing that important episodes in American political and economic history can be better understood by supplementing or reinterpreting more traditional analyses with the basic space theory of ideology. Ideology was measured by D NOMINATE scores. Here we update some of our findings using new estimations that are complete through the end of the 105th Congress. We find that the trend to polarization and unidimensionality that we identified in Congress has continued unabated through the 105th Congress. The shift to Republican control after the 1994 elections is part of this trend and does not represent a sharp break in roll call voting behavior. Comparison of NOMINATE results for the United States to those for other parliaments indicates the ideological character of roll call voting in Congress.

Suggested Citation

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard, D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update To Congress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting (September 27, 1999). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1154162 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154162

Keith T. Poole (Contact Author)

University of Georgia - School of Public and International Affairs ( email )

Baldwin Hall
Athens, GA 30602-6254
United States

Howard Rosenthal

New York University ( email )

19 W 4th St
New York, NY New York 10012
United States
4155199591 (Phone)
4155199591 (Fax)