45 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2008
Date Written: February 2007
We study the impact of incentive pay, local development objectives and government constraints on university licensing performance. We develop and test a simple contracting model of technology licensing offices, using new survey information together with panel data on U.S. universities for 1995-99. We find that private universities are much more likely to adopt incentive pay than public ones, but ownership does not affect licensing performance conditional on the use of incentive pay. Adopting incentive pay is associated with about 30-40 percent more income per license. Universities with strong local development objectives generate about 30 percent less income per license, but are more likely to license to local (in-state) startup companies. Stronger government constraints are 'costly' in terms of foregone license income and startup activity. These results are robust to controls for observed and unobserved heterogeneity.
JEL Classification: O31, O32, O33, F23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Belenzon, Sharon and Schankerman, Mark A., Harnessing Success: Determinants of University Technology Licensing Performance (February 2007). LSE STICERD Research Paper No. EI44. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1158321
By Scott Stern