Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade?
26 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2008
There are 3 versions of this paper
Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade?
Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade?
Abstract
Regional agreements on standards have been largely ignored by economists and blessed by multilateral trade rules. Using a constructed panel data that identifies the different types of agreements at the industry level, we find that such agreements increase the trade between participating countries but not necessarily with the rest of the world. Harmonization of standards may reduce the exports of excluded countries, especially in markets that have raised the stringency of standards. Mutual recognition agreements are more uniformly trade promoting unless they contain restrictive rules of origin, in which case intra-regional trade increases at the expense of imports from other countries.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?
Recommended Papers
-
One Money, One Market: Estimating the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade
-
Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?
-
Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time Series Evidence
By Reuven Glick and Andrew Kenan Rose
-
Does a Currency Union Affect Trade? The Time Series Evidence
By Reuven Glick and Andrew Kenan Rose
-
On Theories Explaining the Success of the Gravity Equation
By Simon J. Evenett and Wolfgang Keller
-
Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes
By Elhanan Helpman, Marc J. Melitz, ...
-
An Estimate of the Effect of Common Currencies on Trade and Income