Speech Discrimination

68 Pages Posted: 12 Jul 2008

See all articles by John Fee

John Fee

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School

Date Written: July, 12 2008

Abstract

This paper examines the legal treatment of content-based regulations under the First Amendment. Rules disfavoring speech discrimination by the government are central to free speech analysis, and yet are poorly understood and often exaggerated. Heightened scrutiny for content-based regulations serves a primary purpose of preserving plentiful means of communication for all citizens, towards the end of promoting speech for its informational value. The distinction between content-based and content-neutral regulation arises in certain settings from the limitations of judicial review and the role of the political process. The distinction does not represent an overarching principle that government should be impartial towards speech, as leading scholars have argued. To require government to be strictly impartial toward speech would do more harm than good for the quality of speech in society. The freedom of speech functions best when government is allowed make policies based on speech preferences, yet is limited in the means of imposing those preferences.

Keywords: First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, Content Discrimination, Content Based, Content Neutral

Suggested Citation

Fee, John, Speech Discrimination (July, 12 2008). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 4, pp. 1103-1170, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1159126

John Fee (Contact Author)

Brigham Young University - J. Reuben Clark Law School ( email )

430 JRCB
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
Abstract Views
2,396
rank
469,764
PlumX Metrics