Copying and Copyright Issues at the Litchfield Law School

26 Pages Posted: 16 Jul 2008  

Angela Fernandez

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Date Written: July, 14 2008

Abstract

The notebook method of legal education used at the famous Litchfield Law School (1774-1833) has long been a subject of intense interest among Connecticut historians, legal historians, and those interested in legal education and the legal profession. The present article, Copying and Copyright Issues at the Litchfield Law School, forthcoming in the fall 2008 volume of Connecticut History, sets the notebook method used at the School in its copying context. More specifically, it explains how the copying of lectures used to create these notebooks gave rise to the problem of rampant unauthorized reproduction, a serious threat to an institution the raison d'etre of which was the production of a set of these notebooks. The article reports on and reproduces excerpts from an 1826 letter evidencing just how dire the situation had become and the lengths to which the School's surviving proprietor, James Gould, was willing to go in order to protect the lectures, as against the sense of the students that they were ripe for reproduction. Gould registered the lectures for copyright protection in 1827 and the question is, given how strongly he felt about the matter, why he did not do it sooner. It would seem that, like the students, Gould took some time to see these notes as a proper object of copyright protection.

Suggested Citation

Fernandez, Angela, Copying and Copyright Issues at the Litchfield Law School (July, 14 2008). U Toronto, Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1160023 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1160023

Angela Fernandez (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 and 84 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Rank
242,919
Abstract Views
1,040