Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1160709
 
 

Citations



 


 



Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research


Alison Liebling


University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law

2001

British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 41, Issue 3, pp. 472-484, 2001

Abstract:     
This article reflects on sympathy and the problem of taking sides in research. It is impossible to be neutral, but is it possible to take more than one side? How far is our research distorted, and how far is it strengthened by forming a sympathetic understanding of those we study? What is the relationship between values and social science and how political are our choices about methods and perspectives? These age-old arguments are revisited in a contemporary context in which the superordinates as well as the subordinates feature in the author's research. The article asks whether synthesis is possible or desirable. These questions have important implications for researchers, but they also have significant consequences for the researched.

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: July 16, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Liebling, Alison, Whose Side are We on? Theory, Practice and Allegiances in Prisons Research ( 2001). British Journal of Criminology, Vol. 41, Issue 3, pp. 472-484, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1160709

Contact Information

Alison Liebling (Contact Author)
University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law ( email )
10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 306

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.359 seconds