The Problem of the Intimidated Witness: The Need to Shore Up the Nance Doctrine Regarding the Admission of Prior Statements

University of Baltimore Law Forum, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1999

11 Pages Posted: 18 Jul 2008

See all articles by Lynn McLain

Lynn McLain

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Date Written: 1999

Abstract

Maryland's courts must not lose sight of the policy determinations faced squarely in Nance. Shoring up the Nance doctrine, by rejecting the distinction drawn by the court of special appeals in Corbett and retreating from the position taken in Tyler, is imperative. So, too, is an open mind to the appropriate use of Maryland Rule 5-804(b)(5)'s residual hearsay exception and the possible adoption of a rule like new Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(5) regarding wrongdoing that procures the unavailability of a witness. The problem of the recanting, intimidated witness will not go away; it threatens Maryland's criminal justice system and must be forcefully addressed.

Keywords: evidence, hearsay, witness intimidation, procuring, unavailability, Nance, Corbett, Tyler, Maryland

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Suggested Citation

McLain, Lynn, The Problem of the Intimidated Witness: The Need to Shore Up the Nance Doctrine Regarding the Admission of Prior Statements (1999). University of Baltimore Law Forum, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1999. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1161298

Lynn McLain (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
34
Abstract Views
414
PlumX Metrics