Footnotes (1)



Prelitigation Hardball after Dominant Semiconductors

Thomas G. Field Jr.

University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

July 17, 2008

Particularly since eBay, patentees who threaten alleged secondary infringers may accomplish more than would be possible by filing suit against primary infringers. Beginning in 1998, the Federal Circuit has found various essentially identical local causes of action, as well as actions under Sec. 43(a) of the Lanham Act to be subject to a federal privilege. Recent opinions confirm that anyone may be threatened with suit unless allegations of infringement are "objectively baseless."

Yet it seems that such contact should be forbidden at least until suit has been filed against the primary infringer. Patentees whose suits cannot pass muster under F. R. Civ. Pro. 11 should be barred from contacting secondary infringers whose stakes are too small to credit rebutting legal opinions offered by primary infringers, much less seek independent opinions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

Keywords: patent litigation, commercial speech, secondary infringers, F.R.C.Pro 11, privilege, patent preemption

JEL Classification: K10, K20, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: July 17, 2008 ; Last revised: July 28, 2008

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G., Prelitigation Hardball after Dominant Semiconductors (July 17, 2008). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1162150 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1162150

Contact Information

Thomas G. Field Jr. (Contact Author)
University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center) ( email )
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States
HOME PAGE: http://https://law.unh.edu/faculty/field
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 487
Downloads: 24
Footnotes:  1
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper