Universality vs. Particularity: Litigating Middle Class Values under Section 15

Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 33, pp. 367-387, 2006

11 Pages Posted: 17 Jul 2008

See all articles by David Schneiderman

David Schneiderman

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law

Date Written: July, 17 2008

Abstract

This paper examines Supreme Court of Canada equality cases concerning access to benefits. I ask whether claims based upon what the Court considers to be universalistic schemes - programmes which are intended to embrace everyone - are more likely to be successful than are claims seeking access to targeted or means-tested plans, where fundamental distinctions between classes are built into the very structure of the schemes. A review of the cases suggests that the Supreme Court of Canada will be more partial to equality claims that concern access to what can be characterized as universal rather than targeted benefits. How the Court comes to these determinations, I suggest, reveals something about the Court's preference for broad-based middle-class programs.

Suggested Citation

Schneiderman, David, Universality vs. Particularity: Litigating Middle Class Values under Section 15 (July, 17 2008). Supreme Court Law Review, Vol. 33, pp. 367-387, 2006, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1162274

David Schneiderman (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Faculty of Law ( email )

78 Queen's Park
Toronto, Ontario M5S 2C5
Canada
416-978-2677 (Phone)
416-978-7899 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
83
Abstract Views
1,106
rank
361,762
PlumX Metrics