Reply to Miser's Commentary on 'Democracy Does Not Make Good Science: On Reforming Review Procedures for Management Science Journals'
4 Pages Posted: 21 Jul 2008
Date Written: July, 21 2008
Abstract
I agree with almost everything that Miser says. The one major disagreement is that he believes changes in the review procedures would be of marginal importance whereas I believe that they are vital.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness, and Innovation
-
Does the Need for Agreement Among Reviewers Inhibit the Publication of Controversial Findings?
-
Management Folklore and Management Science - on Portfolio Planning, Escalation Bias, and Such
-
Last Writes? Re-Assessing the Law Review in the Age of Cyberspace
-
Yesterday Once More: Skeptics, Scribes and the Demise of Law Reviews
-
Incentives for Developing and Communicating Principles: A Reply
-
Editorial Policies for the Publication of Controversial Findings
-
Factors Influencing Academic Research Productivity: A Survey of Management Scientists
-
Publishing Standards for Research in Forecasting (Editorial)