Collusion in a One-Period Insurance Market with Adverse Selection
24 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2008 Last revised: 21 Sep 2009
Date Written: September 1, 2009
Abstract
We show how collusive outcomes may occur in equilibrium in a one-period competitive insurance market characterized by adverse selection. We build on the Inderst and Wambach (2001) model and assume that insurees must pay a minimum premium, which is a common feature in many health systems. In this setup we show that there is a range of equilibria, from the zero profit one in which low-risks implicitly subsidize high risks, to one where firms obtain profits with both types of consumers. Moreover, we show that rents only partially dissipate if we assume free entry.
Along these equilibria, high risks always obtain full insurance while the low risks coverage decreases as the firms' profits increase.
Keywords: adverse selection, collusion, insurance, capacity constraints
JEL Classification: I11, I18, L41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Don't Give Up on Me Baby: Spousal Correlation in Smoking Behaviour
By Andrew Clark and Fabrice Etile
-
All in the Family: Mental Health Spillover Effects between Working Spouses
-
Copayments in the German Health System: Does it Work?
By Boris Augurzky, Thomas K. Bauer, ...
-
Measurement of Horizontal Inequity in Health Care Utilisation Using European Panel Data
By Teresa Bago D'uva, Andrew M. Jones, ...
-
Do Optional Deductibles Reduce the Number of Doctor Visits? Empirical Evidence with German Data
-
Do Optional Deductibles Reduce the Number of Doctor Visits? Empirical Evidence with German Data
-
Co-Pay and Feel Okay: Evidence of Illusory Health Gains from a Health Insurance Reform